About Me

Name: Bob Parks
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Blacklash: How Others Now View U.S.

  For years, Democrats have lamented how badly the Bush Administration has left our “standing” in the world. Other nations “hate” us; wish us ill, blah blah blah. Even Mexicans are thinking twice before sneaking across our border.

However, the race for the presidency has given some more reasons to look down on America. This time, their criticisms aren’t aimed solely at George W. Bush, but the very people who are crying because people don’t like us anymore.

The 2008 US election has all the makings of a Greek tragedy, in which noble heroes and heroines are forced to follow a course to catastrophe, divinely preordained as punishment for sins and blunders committed by their forefathers in the dim and distant past.

If this description sounds too grandiose, consider yesterday's results from the Pennsylvania primary. The outcome seemed to be precisely calibrated by the gods to maximize the agony of the Democrats. It gave Hillary Clinton just the support she needed to stay firmly in contention, but not quite enough to turn the tide in her favour.

Worse still, this result underlined the fear that senior Democrats have long been aware of, but have never dared to express in public: America may not yet be ready to elect a black President.

Anatole Kaletsky, The Times of London, 4/24/08

To make matters worse, the Democrat presidential campaign is bringing out the very racial antagonism they consistently (and politically) accuse Republicans of.

House Democratic Whip James Clyburn, of South Carolina and the highest ranking black in Congress, also said he has heard speculation that Clinton is staying in the race only to try to derail Obama and pave the way for her to make another White House run in 2012.

“I heard something, the first time yesterday (in South Carolina), and I heard it on the (House) floor today, which is telling me there are African Americans who have reached the decision that the Clintons know that she can’t win this. But they’re hell-bound to make it impossible for Obama to win” in November, Clyburn told Reuters in an interview.

So according to The Times, if “America may not yet be ready to elect a black President” and the Clintons are now sabotaging the primary to keep their door open for the future, just what does that say about Hillary and the Democrat Party? If their attacks on Obama are race-based, then maybe the lie they’ve been living for decades has been exposed and the damage done to their standing with the black community has yet to be felt in full.

For years Democrats have used the black community (and their votes) as a wedge against Republicans. Every time the race card could be used against a conservative candidate, it would be. Something John McCain should be prepared for should Obama squeeze through the Clinton barbed wire. But most Democrats believed THEY were above the stench of racism.

Let’s not forget Michelle Obama’s college thesis, in which she lamented her feeling isolated by her white liberal Princeton peers and professoriate.   Continued...

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Three Stooges Meet The Butcher

Now, this kind of stinks, don’t it?

According to the Associated Press,

“Saddam Hussein's intelligence agency secretly financed a trip to Iraq for three U.S. lawmakers during the run-up to the U.S.-led invasion, federal prosecutors said Wednesday.

 “An indictment unsealed in Detroit accuses Muthanna Al-Hanooti, a member of a Michigan nonprofit group, of arranging for three members of Congress to travel to Iraq in October 2002 at the behest of Saddam's regime. Prosecutors say Iraqi intelligence officials paid for the trip through an intermediary.”

Why is it that Democrats seemingly love to embrace our enemies?

One local version of this story conveniently left out the fact that these are anti-war Democrats we’re talking about. There is this stereotype that liberals are freeloader types. United States congressmen have money, and at any given opportunity, don’t hesitate to give the American people the privilege of footing their bills.

Then again, if they (or we) pay for such a trip, there will be some kind of paper trail. But if someone else pays for it, we may not know about it, that is, until someone gets… indicted.

Why would United States congressmen go on a junket to a country they know we’re about to be in a military conflict with? Did they go to negotiate? Were they going to volunteer to become human shields? They were criticized for going.

“Oklahoma Sen. Don Nickles, the second-ranking Senate Republican at the time, said the Democrats ‘sound somewhat like spokespersons for the Iraqi government.’”

Oh, by the way, the congressmen were Jim McDermott of Washington, David Bonior of Michigan and Mike Thompson of California, and there’s no proof to date that they knew their trip was courtesy of Saddam Hussein. Now this is only me, but if someone were paying for my trip half way around the world, I think I would know who was paying for it. That is, unless getting international trips paid for is so common, no one asks.

To date, nobody knows nothing. It always amazes me how the congressmen and senators declare themselves brilliant enough to impose legislation that sometimes has serious effects on our lives, yet when there is any hint of malfeasance on their part, nobody knows nothing.

That’s not so say this won’t change. We’re only at the infancy of this controversy. Many mainstream media outlets won’t “discover” this story for a couple more days, but there’s smoke here…Continued...

Tags: Democrats  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »